On the other hand, in the case of a bona foi license agreement, the tenant-licensee does not own a property on the premises and has no ownership rights. Common law principles apply, and the owner-licensor has the unlimited right to use peaceful self-help at any time to remove a licensee from the licensed premises for any reason or no reason. The legal relationship established by a rental agreement between the owner and the owner and a tenant is completely different from the legal relationship established by a license between the owner-licensor and a licensee. Does the document give the non-owner rights to the premises, such as the right to carry out repair work or to be responsible for safety? Does the owner have to terminate it in this regard before terminating the contract with the contract? Does the document contain a «grace period» in case of default on the part of the uns due party? Is there a holdback provision in the document? If the answer to these questions is yes, it is unlikely that the agreement between the parties is a true license, even if the document is titled as such and is likely to be a lease. A lease is a transfer of exclusive ownership of a particular property. usually against payment of rent that transfers a discount to the fellow, [whereas] one license, on the other hand, only prescribes authorized actions on the land of another, which otherwise would not lack permission. A license is considered revocable according to the will of the licensor and does not create a discount. Examples of licensing can be found in many different industries. An example of a license agreement is an agreement between software copyright holders and a company that allows them to use the computer software for their day-to-day business operations. At present, real estate licensing agreements seem to be mainly used by authorized owners to short-term users: office spaces, laundry rooms, certain types of storage spaces and kiosks in shopping malls.
It is clear that there is a market for such agreements. The question of whether there is a market for real estate licensing agreements for other types of occupation may not be so obvious, but given the need to free landlords from the onerous burdens and frustrations of traditional landlord-tenant disputes, such an agreement can be useful for the right business plan. In addition to providing detailed information about all parties involved, the license agreements detail how the parties authorized to use the real estate, including the following parameters: If you have any questions about this position or real estate issues, please contact me at email@example.com. Among the most important rights of the owner-licensor in a licensing relationship is the right to revoke the license «at will» and use «self-help» to remove a defaulting licensee from authorized premises without having to endure months or years of long and frustrating litigation to regain ownership of valuable real estate. From both parties` perspective, licensing agreements are usually personal and specific to the current operator and owner. According to the legal definition, a lease is a set of rights granted by the landlord to the tenant and integrated into the property. In comparison, a license only conveys a privilege of using the property, which makes this act legal. Nevertheless, the use of a license agreement instead of a rental agreement will not completely exclude all possibilities of dispute between the owner-licensor and the tenant-licensee. Whether or not the «self-help» used was peaceful (and therefore legal) or violent (and therefore illegal) is always a possible subject of legal disputes. However, if there is a valid license agreement, the owner-licensor is not obliged to bring the displaced licensee back to the premises, even if it turns out that the self-help used was violent and dissatisfied. In New York, the licensee`s only remedy is the triple compensation provided for in section 853 of the RPAPL in the event of a violent ejection […].